📝 Correction | Canadian Key Disclosure status #2039

Closed
opened 2020-08-31 16:47:30 +00:00 by markjr · 3 comments
markjr commented 2020-08-31 16:47:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Description

Canada is listed under countries where individuals are subject to key disclosure laws, yet the link to the Wikipedia citation actually reads as the opposite - that attempts to compel individuals to turn over keys have failed in court and that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms enshrines the right to protect against self-incrimination.

Why I am making the suggestion

I don't know what the legal status actually is in Canada, but the citation provided in the list actually says the opposite of what Canada's listing in that column suggests.

My connection with the software

None

  • I will keep the issue up-to-date if something I have said changes or I remember a connection with the software.
## Description Canada is listed under countries where individuals are subject to key disclosure laws, yet the link to the Wikipedia citation actually reads as the opposite - that attempts to compel individuals to turn over keys have failed in court and that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms enshrines the right to protect against self-incrimination. ## Why I am making the suggestion I don't know what the legal status actually is in Canada, but the citation provided in the list actually says the opposite of what Canada's listing in that column suggests. ## My connection with the software None - [x] I will keep the issue up-to-date if something I have said changes or I remember a connection with the software.
freddy-m commented 2020-08-31 19:16:44 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I've update your issue, please use the templates provided in future. This is definately something to look into, so thanks for opening the issue.

I've update your issue, please use the templates provided in future. This is definately something to look into, so thanks for opening the issue.
markjr commented 2020-08-31 19:26:36 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Ok thanks - sorry will do in the future.

Ok thanks - sorry will do in the future.
dngray commented 2020-09-03 14:41:08 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Yes, we need to put a PR in for this. I had forgotten about it https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/issues/1167#issuecomment-604583930

Yes, we need to put a PR in for this. I had forgotten about it https://github.com/privacytools/privacytools.io/issues/1167#issuecomment-604583930
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#2039
No description provided.