Archived
🆕 Software Suggestion | Passit #1985
Open
opened 2020-07-07 23:13:27 +00:00 by fabianski7
·
4 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
master
dependabot/bundler/nokogiri-1.13.6
dependabot/bundler/addressable-2.8.0
freddy-m-patch-3
pr-add_RemoveMyPhone_sponsor
pr-browser_cleanup_1257_1328_1430
freddy-m-patch-2
freddy-m-patch-1
pr-vpn_hated_one_video
cdn
update-nitrohorse-image
promote-metager-to-card
hardware
pr-add_azirevpn
pr-add_mailfence
shop
1673
pr/1658
i18n-simple
sponsorship-edits-nov2019
i18n
ipfs
blacklight447-ptio-patch-3
blog
remove-windows-icons
pr/1147
i18n-testing
add-beautify
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
:mag:🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
approved, waiting for a PR
Pull requests that update a dependency file
The Invisible Internet Project (I2P)
Operating Systems
A label for stalebot if it gets added
Anything related to media streaming.
Anything covering the Tor network
active work in progress, do not merge or PR (yet)!
Issues or bugs that will not be fixed and/or do not have significant impact on the project.
Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
Matrix protocol
Browser Extension related issues
Correction of content on the website
Firefox & forks, about:config etc.
Anything primarily related to site cleanup.
Virtual Private Network
*Technical* issues with the website.
Domain Name System
Anything covering a translated version of the site
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1985
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Basic Information
Name: Passit
Category: Password Manager
URL: https://passit.io
GIT: https://gitlab.com/passit
Description
Passit is an open-source, cloud-based password manager. It was built by people who love digital privacy and good design, and weren't satisfied with existing options. In every decision we make, we strive to strike a good balance between features, ease-of-use, security, and privacy. Passit uses the modern and battle-tested libsodium cryptography package to encrypt data in such a way that even we can't access.
https://gitlab.com/passit/passit/-/wikis/security
http://passit.io/security-model.html
Why I am making the suggestion
This is a very simple password manager that uses libsodium (already audited - 2017) for the encryption of keys and password hash. With extensions for Firefox and Chromium. Totally opensource, it can be self-hosted but also provides a free account with an option to share passwords with others.
My connection with the software
Only one user who loved the simplicity of this project xD
Libsodium is audited but I can't find any audit on Passit. I think this should be required before listing a password manager. Project looks promising.
I think so, too. But there are already some listed password managers that haven't been audited yet.
KeePass has undergone an audit, but not the popular KeePassXC, or mobile clients as far as I'm aware. While audits are important, it's also worth noting that it costs time and effort to do so, and if we had to audit every application before considering it recommended we'd get no where.
With that said, this issue should be closed. It doesn't have anything than can top BitWarden, nor KeePass clients.
Although Passit doesn't have exceptionally innovative features and indeed is in competition with BitWarden, it doesn't preclude that it is an alternative that is still feature-rich from what I can see. It also has a few different features, such as the ability to import/export passwords as CSV files, which can be interesting for certain use cases, such as bulk migration (NB: BitWarden can import passwords in bulk but not from CSV files).
I think it should be added as a Worth Mentioning, but not as a recommendation (since it's not audited and younger).