❌ Software Removal | Tutanota #1769

New Issue

2020-03-06T12:24:03Z

ghost commented

2020-03-06 12:24:03 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Description

Suggest removal of Tutanota.

Why I am making the suggestion

No value for Mode=block in X-XSS-Protection
Content-Security-Policy contains 'unsafe-inline' value
Does not support DNS CAA.
Does not support payment in cryptocurrencies.
Operated in Fourteen Eyes countries

My connection with the software

Unrelated

[✔] I will keep the issue up-to-date if something I have said changes or I remember a connection with the software.

## Description Suggest removal of Tutanota. ## Why I am making the suggestion - No value for Mode=block in X-XSS-Protection - Content-Security-Policy contains 'unsafe-inline' value - Does not support DNS CAA. - Does not support payment in cryptocurrencies. - Operated in Fourteen Eyes countries ## My connection with the software Unrelated - [✔] I will keep the issue up-to-date if something I have said changes or I remember a connection with the software.

5a384507-18ce-417c-bb55-d4dfcc8883fe commented

2020-03-06 13:40:40 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Does not support payment in cryptocurrencies.

Operated in Fourteen Eyes countries

I don't know about the others, but if you are going to accept only BTC it's not the big deal, since you are only pseudo-anonymous, and the latter it's not a necessary point on the criteria.

> * Does not support payment in cryptocurrencies. > > * Operated in Fourteen Eyes countries I don't know about the others, but if you are going to accept only BTC it's not the big deal, since you are only pseudo-anonymous, and the latter it's not a necessary point on the criteria.

🚀 1

blacklight447 commented

2020-03-06 14:40:05 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Description

Suggest removal of Tutanota.

Why I am making the suggestion

* No value for Mode=block in X-XSS-Protection

* Content-Security-Policy contains 'unsafe-inline' value

* Does not support DNS CAA.

* Does not support payment in cryptocurrencies.

* Operated in Fourteen Eyes countries

My connection with the software

Unrelated

* [✔] I will keep the issue up-to-date if something I have said changes or I remember a connection with the software.

Being outside the fourteen eyes is not in our minimum criteria, neither is anonymous payments.

We also don't require CAA since we already require DANE.

And the other two: those are on track on becoming part of the minimum criteria next year.

So so far, I don't really see a reason that would validate delisting. @dngray

> > ## Description > > Suggest removal of Tutanota. > ## Why I am making the suggestion > > * No value for Mode=block in X-XSS-Protection > > * Content-Security-Policy contains 'unsafe-inline' value > > * Does not support DNS CAA. > > * Does not support payment in cryptocurrencies. > > * Operated in Fourteen Eyes countries > > > ## My connection with the software > > Unrelated > > * [✔] I will keep the issue up-to-date if something I have said changes or I remember a connection with the software. Being outside the fourteen eyes is not in our minimum criteria, neither is anonymous payments. We also don't require CAA since we already require DANE. And the other two: those are on track on becoming part of the minimum criteria next year. So so far, I don't really see a reason that would validate delisting. @dngray

👍 1

dngray commented

2020-03-06 16:45:52 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Agreed.

👍 2

This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.