✨ Feature Suggestion | Move the "More Privacy Resources" from the home page to the wiki #1757
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1757
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
The mentioned section should be moved to the wiki since it looks like a better place to archive that kind of information, also each web site listed there can be better described, and it will give the main page a better and smoother appearance.
Instead, a sign that shows people that the wiki exists, and that they could find more in depth information about specific software, providers, services and more resources, too, should be added to the "Participate with suggestions and constructive criticism" section. This will also look more aesthetic since now the number of entries is even.
Suggested text for the sign:
We are currently still in the process of deciding where the wiki will be used for.
we need to be cautiones not to make the information on privacytools more scattered (the whole goal behind PTIO is to make one user friendly central place where you can find all info, instead of needing to search through the entire internet.
So i would put this idea "on hold" for some time till we have come to a decision.
@blacklight447-ptio Okay, I thought the idea of the wiki was to host content that it would be too large in text to be in the website. I don't think that it scatters the information through the internet, though, all the more relevant and brief information would still need to be on the main website.
But sure, think about it. :D