🆕 Software Suggestion | AnonAddy.com #1673

New Issue

2020-01-30T10:42:30Z

willbrowningme commented

2020-01-30 10:42:30 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Basic Information

Name: AnonAddy (short for anonymous email address)
Category: Email
URL: https://anonaddy.com

Description

Open-source anonymous email forwarding. Create unlimited aliases for free.

Features Include:

GPG/OpenPGP encryption on forwarded emails
Browser extension
Custom domains
Reply to forwarded emails and send from aliases (paid feature)
UUID / Random Word aliases at shared domains
API

FAQ: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy#anonymous-email-forwarding
Privacy Policy: https://anonaddy.com/privacy/
Terms: https://anonaddy.com/terms/

Why I am making the suggestion

I believe this service can complement email providers such as Tutanota/Protonmail by allowing users to create a different email alias for each site/service that they use.

If someone is still using a provider such as Gmail they can add their own GPG key to encrypt all forwarded emails and prevent inbox snooping.

My connection with the software

I am the author of this software, working on it full time.

[X ] I will keep the issue up-to-date if something I have said changes or I remember a connection with the software.

## Basic Information **Name:** AnonAddy (short for anonymous email address) **Category:** Email **URL:** https://anonaddy.com ## Description Open-source anonymous email forwarding. Create unlimited aliases for free. Features Include: - GPG/OpenPGP encryption on forwarded emails - Browser extension - Custom domains - Reply to forwarded emails and send from aliases (paid feature) - UUID / Random Word aliases at shared domains - API **FAQ**: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy#anonymous-email-forwarding **Privacy Policy**: https://anonaddy.com/privacy/ **Terms**: https://anonaddy.com/terms/ ## Why I am making the suggestion I believe this service can complement email providers such as Tutanota/Protonmail by allowing users to create a different email alias for each site/service that they use. If someone is still using a provider such as Gmail they can add their own GPG key to encrypt all forwarded emails and prevent inbox snooping. ## My connection with the software I am the author of this software, working on it full time. - [X ] I will keep the issue up-to-date if something I have said changes or I remember a connection with the software.

👍 1

nitrohorse commented

2020-02-01 18:37:47 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I only have positive things to say about this service; I think it'd be worth adding to the "Interesting email providers or services under development" section.

❤️ 1

Zcr34 commented

2020-02-01 22:10:03 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Seems to be entirely open source, something I like to see. (confirmation?)

Source Code: https://github.com/anonaddy
Self Hosting Instructions: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy#self-hosting

@willbrowningme How is your project different from SpamGourmet or Enrine.email?

Related to #733 and #1672

Seems to be entirely open source, something I like to see. (confirmation?) **Source Code**: https://github.com/anonaddy **Self Hosting Instructions**: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy#self-hosting ___________________ @willbrowningme How is your project different from SpamGourmet or Enrine.email? Related to #733 and #1672

dngray commented

2020-02-02 02:02:25 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

We could put mention of it at the bottom where me mention c0x0.com

👍 2

willbrowningme commented

2020-02-02 10:59:35 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Yes the service is open-source and can be self-hosted (although I need to add to the instructions).

@Zcr34 The ability to add your own GPG key to encrypt all fowarded emails. You can send from aliases (initiate email conversation), I know Erine.email does support this too. You can use aliases at shared domains that are not linked back to you by your username. You can add multiple recipients per alias. API access is available as well as a browser extension. AnonAddy is also all green on hardenize.com.

Yes the service is open-source and can be self-hosted (although I need to add to the instructions). @Zcr34 The ability to add your own GPG key to encrypt all fowarded emails. You can send from aliases (initiate email conversation), I know Erine.email does support this too. You can use aliases at shared domains that are not linked back to you by your username. You can add multiple recipients per alias. API access is available as well as a browser extension. AnonAddy is also all green on hardenize.com.

dngray commented

2020-02-02 12:00:43 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Keep in mind all email forwarding must abide by the email criteria or it shall not be listed see #1672 for that, this includes things like MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, DANE verification etc.

willbrowningme commented

2020-02-02 12:57:32 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@dngray Thanks, it has MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, DANE, DNSSEC, CAA, PFS, registration on the EFF's STARTTLS-Everywhere list, 2FA (on accounts).

Some more details can be found here - https://anonaddy.com/security/

@dngray Thanks, it has MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, DANE, DNSSEC, CAA, PFS, registration on the EFF's STARTTLS-Everywhere list, 2FA (on accounts). Some more details can be found here - https://anonaddy.com/security/

dngray commented

2020-02-02 14:34:11 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@willbrowningme How is your project different from SpamGourmet or Enrine.email?

I meant in regard to these.

> @willbrowningme How is your project different from SpamGourmet or Enrine.email? I meant in regard to these.

ceptonit commented

2020-02-04 01:31:34 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Have they been audited?

I really like the concept but if there are flaws, one could just read all the emails coming through, isn' it?

Have they been audited? I really like the concept but if there are flaws, one could just read all the emails coming through, isn' it?

dngray commented

2020-02-04 02:08:51 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

No they haven't but virtually no email provider has.

ceptonit commented

2020-02-04 02:16:27 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

No they haven't but virtually no email provider has.

Protonmail is the only one I know of that has been audited, they get audited every year.

> No they haven't but virtually no email provider has. Protonmail is the only one I know of that has been audited, they get audited every year.

dngray commented

2020-02-04 04:39:59 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

That's right, ProtonMail was audited by Cyberkov.

That's right, ProtonMail [was audited by Cyberkov](https://reddit.com/comments/6i3w4t/comment/dj3mnln/).

5a384507-18ce-417c-bb55-d4dfcc8883fe commented

2020-02-04 15:03:41 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

We could put mention of it at the bottom where me mention c0x0.com

Why mentioning c0x0 if it's closed source when there are other open source alternatives?

> We could put mention of it at the bottom where me mention c0x0.com Why mentioning c0x0 if it's closed source when there are other open source alternatives?

blacklight447 commented

2020-02-04 16:19:38 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

To be fair, as its a service, being open source matters a lot less since you cannot be sure that the code they publish is the same code they are running. Open source with services only really matter if you want to self host.

5a384507-18ce-417c-bb55-d4dfcc8883fe commented

2020-02-04 19:06:36 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

To be fair, as its a service, being open source matters a lot less since you cannot be sure that the code they publish is the same code they are running. Open source with services only really matter if you want to self host.

Well, you have the option to self-host with all of them if that's the case, still a feel a lot more safe with open source alternatives and if it's the same I still don't see the problem with recommending the options I mentioned.

> To be fair, as its a service, being open source matters a lot less since you cannot be sure that the code they publish is the same code they are running. Open source with services only really matter if you want to self host. Well, you have the option to self-host with all of them if that's the case, still a feel a lot more safe with open source alternatives and if it's the same I still don't see the problem with recommending the options I mentioned.

dngray commented

2020-02-15 09:58:56 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Closing this as it's already been taken care of.

👍 2

This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.