🌐 Website Issue | Bromite description #1588

Closed
opened 2019-12-15 02:28:32 +00:00 by csagan5 · 1 comment
csagan5 commented 2019-12-15 02:28:32 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I have seen in the past some privacytoolsIO GitHub issues about Bromite but I have only loosely followed them; now I realise it is a recommendation in the browsers section of the website.

I have a suggestions to improve the description: if one has to choose a single project to mention for the patches, I would mention ungoogled-chromium rather than GrapheneOS because there are only few patches used from the latter (the majority are Bromite patches, see here).

Aside from that, great work on the website! It looks very clear and understandable for different types of visitors.

Edit: not sure why it got added the high priority label on its own, maybe it's a default - but I do not consider this as high priority.

I have seen in the past some privacytoolsIO GitHub issues about Bromite but I have only loosely followed them; now I realise it is a recommendation in the [browsers section of the website](https://www.privacytools.io/browsers/). I have a suggestions to improve the description: if one has to choose a single project to mention for the patches, I would mention [ungoogled-chromium](https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium) rather than [GrapheneOS](https://grapheneos.org/) because there are only few patches used from the latter (the majority are Bromite patches, see [here](https://github.com/bromite/bromite/tree/master/build/patches)). Aside from that, great work on the website! It looks very clear and understandable for different types of visitors. Edit: not sure why it got added the `high priority` label on its own, maybe it's a default - but I do not consider this as high priority.
blacklight447 commented 2019-12-17 20:16:40 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Yeah the label is the default ( note to self, I should probbaly change that) in any case, who you like to make a quick PR for this? :)

Yeah the label is the default ( note to self, I should probbaly change that) in any case, who you like to make a quick PR for this? :)
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1588
No description provided.