Remote port forwarding badge for VPN providers #1570

jonah · 2019-12-05T13:12:15Z

dngray commented

2019-12-05 13:12:15 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

https://deploy-preview-1570--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/vpn/

blacklight447 (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-12-05 13:12:15 +00:00

netlify[bot] commented

2019-12-05 13:12:57 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!

Built with commit adf20a1202

https://deploy-preview-1570--privacytools-io.netlify.com

Deploy preview for *privacytools-io* ready! Built with commit adf20a12025eff59d2a6bc6b80f98bed56d1599c https://deploy-preview-1570--privacytools-io.netlify.com

Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-12-05 13:27:25 +00:00

Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

https://deploy-preview-1570--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/vpn/ - LGTM

jonah reviewed 2019-12-05 17:13:45 +00:00

jonah left a comment

Reads as advertising, don't see how it is relevant (i.e. not related to our VPN criteria). I would move to the additional functionality section below.

dngray commented

2019-12-05 17:49:08 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Reads as advertising, don't see how it is relevant (i.e. not related to our VPN criteria). I would move to the additional functionality section below.

Certainly comes under the technology section. Particularly when choosing a VPN for P2P purposes its nice to be able to open a port to get more peers. I think that information could be useful to people.

In the case of IVPN, that would probably be the main reason someone would go with a more expensive pro account over a cheaper one. Mullvad does it across all their accounts.

But I guess i can move it to extra functionality, but personally i think the feature is a bit 'major' for that.

> Reads as advertising, don't see how it is relevant (i.e. not related to our VPN criteria). I would move to the additional functionality section below. Certainly comes under the technology section. Particularly when choosing a VPN for P2P purposes its nice to be able to open a port to get more peers. I think that information could be useful to people. In the case of IVPN, that would probably be the main reason someone would go with a more expensive pro account over a cheaper one. Mullvad does it across all their accounts. But I guess i can move it to extra functionality, but personally i think the feature is a bit 'major' for that.

👍 1

djoate (Migrated from github.com) requested changes 2019-12-06 03:37:25 +00:00

_includes/sections/vpn.html

djoate (Migrated from github.com) commented

2019-12-06 03:35:29 +00:00

Maybe we should mention that port forwarding is only available for OpenVPN and non-US servers (https://www.ivpn.net/knowledgebase/116/Port-forwarding-is-not-working-why.html)

Also, it seems that Pro is used as a proper noun (for example, they say it as "IVPN Pro plan" at https://www.ivpn.net/knowledgebase/20/How-many-devices-or-simultaneous-connections-can-I-have-to-IVPN.html)

    <p>Remote <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_forwarding">port forwarding</a> is possible with a Pro plan. Port forwarding <a href="https://www.ivpn.net/knowledgebase/81/How-do-I-activate-port-forwarding.html">can be activated</a> via the client area.</p>

Maybe we should mention that port forwarding is only available for OpenVPN and non-US servers (https://www.ivpn.net/knowledgebase/116/Port-forwarding-is-not-working-why.html) Also, it seems that Pro is used as a proper noun (for example, they say it as "IVPN Pro plan" at https://www.ivpn.net/knowledgebase/20/How-many-devices-or-simultaneous-connections-can-I-have-to-IVPN.html) ```suggestion <p>Remote <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_forwarding">port forwarding</a> is possible with a Pro plan. Port forwarding <a href="https://www.ivpn.net/knowledgebase/81/How-do-I-activate-port-forwarding.html">can be activated</a> via the client area.</p> ```

pages/providers/vpn.html

djoate (Migrated from github.com) commented

2019-12-06 03:31:25 +00:00

        <li>Capability of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_forwarding#Remote_port_forwarding">remote port fowarding</a> assists in creating connections when using P2P (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-to-peer">Peer-to-Peer</a>) filesharing software, Freenet, or hosting a server (e.g., Mumble).</li>

```suggestion <li>Capability of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_forwarding#Remote_port_forwarding">remote port fowarding</a> assists in creating connections when using P2P (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-to-peer">Peer-to-Peer</a>) filesharing software, Freenet, or hosting a server (e.g., Mumble).</li> ```

dngray (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-12-06 05:11:10 +00:00

_includes/sections/vpn.html

dngray (Migrated from github.com) commented

2019-12-06 05:11:10 +00:00

Maybe we should mention that port forwarding is only available for OpenVPN and non-US servers (https://www.ivpn.net/knowledgebase/116/Port-forwarding-is-not-working-why.html)

The reason for that is they don't want people doing P2P on US servers, likely because of DMCA notices. I have noticed that with a few providers.

They are also doing Wireguard, so that might not be strictly true about it only being available with OpenVPN, in the future.

> Maybe we should mention that port forwarding is only available for OpenVPN and non-US servers (https://www.ivpn.net/knowledgebase/116/Port-forwarding-is-not-working-why.html) The reason for that is they don't want people doing P2P on US servers, likely because of DMCA notices. I have noticed that with a few providers. They are also doing Wireguard, so that might not be strictly true about it only being available with OpenVPN, in the future.

dngray (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-12-06 05:18:09 +00:00

_includes/sections/vpn.html

dngray (Migrated from github.com) commented

2019-12-06 05:18:08 +00:00

Looking at https://mullvad.net/help/port-forwarding-and-mullvad/ it seems that port forwarding over wireguard is certainly possible, so I think that's a fair point.

Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2019-12-07 19:20:14 +00:00

nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2019-12-07 22:24:09 +00:00

nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

I’d agree with @dngray here, I think this is fine adding to the criteria apart from Additional Functionality as a separate line item.

This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.

1 Participants

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1570