❌ Software Removal | "Email Alternatives" Section #1542
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1542
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
In general this section doesn't make sense to me. RetroShare could be merged into either social networks or RTC (or removed entirely, because the current social network and IM suggestions both accomplish their goals better than RS it seems like). We do have it as worth mentioning in RTC currently anyhow. BitMessage could be merged into RTC as well, but again I'm not sure if it would be worth recommending alongside the current P2P listings. Perhaps as a worth mentioning product only, again.
From a security perspective I strongly believe the only email alternatives we should be recommending for communication are RTC tools that are purpose-built for that task, like Signal.
👍 I wasn't even aware we have this section (kind of reminds me of Instant Messengers + VoIP having been separate pages) and I don't know anyone using those.
Agree, never understood why we have this section.
I agree, bitmessage could go under the peer-to-peer worth mentioning section.
Although that still leaves i2pbote.xyz, maybe that should go under the self contained section, with i2p, as it requires that?