privacyguides/privacytools.io
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 304 Pull Requests 47 Activity

privacytools.io site fails on mozilla obervatory #151

New Issue
Closed
opened 2017-01-04 14:16:02 +00:00 by p43b1 · 7 comments
p43b1 commented 2017-01-04 14:16:02 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

The site privacytools.io gets an awful score on mozilla oberservatory

https://observatory.mozilla.org/analyze.html?host=www.privacytools.io

The site privacytools.io gets an awful score on mozilla oberservatory https://observatory.mozilla.org/analyze.html?host=www.privacytools.io
ghost commented 2017-01-04 14:21:41 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Thanks. All the points we lost are because of headers. Not sure whether this can be improved, as we use CloudFlare. @privacytoolsIO can you add headers with CF?

Thanks. All the points we lost are because of headers. Not sure whether this can be improved, as we use CloudFlare. @privacytoolsIO can you add headers with CF?
👍 1
Vincevrp commented 2018-11-25 20:13:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

The website also has a bad score on gtmetrix. Prehaps @privacytoolsIO can optimize some of these issues?

The website also has a bad score on [gtmetrix](https://gtmetrix.com/). Prehaps @privacytoolsIO can optimize some of these issues?
ghost commented 2018-11-25 20:14:42 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Doesn't GH support HTTPS without CF now?

Doesn't GH support HTTPS without CF now?
Vincevrp commented 2018-11-25 20:17:08 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Doesn't GH support HTTPS without CF now?

It does but Github cache settings aren't optimal, I think you could better optimize it with CF. Though if CF is seen as a privacy issue, we'd be better of without it.

> Doesn't GH support HTTPS without CF now? It does but Github cache settings aren't optimal, I think you could better optimize it with CF. Though if CF is seen as a privacy issue, we'd be better of without it.
nikhiljha commented 2018-11-25 20:18:07 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

GitHub's server also scores an F on observatory for similar reasons.

GitHub's server also scores an F on observatory for similar reasons.
jonah commented 2019-03-30 01:39:26 +00:00
Copy Link

The website also has a bad score on gtmetrix. Prehaps @privacytoolsIO can optimize some of these issues?

Okay, here you go:

image

We also score fine on SSL Labs. I don't think Mozilla Observatory is a big deal since we redirect to HTTPS, nor something that we can fix while on GitHub Pages.

We could probably consider implementing HSTS though.

>The website also has a bad score on gtmetrix. Prehaps @privacytoolsIO can optimize some of these issues? Okay, [here you go](https://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.privacytools.io/wgszB4lW): [![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3637842/55269515-518d5400-5262-11e9-9c36-038ec2030b42.png)](https://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.privacytools.io/wgszB4lW) We also [score fine](https://globalsign.ssllabs.com/analyze.html?d=www.privacytools.io&s=104.28.22.220&latest) on SSL Labs. I don't *think* Mozilla Observatory is a big deal since we redirect to HTTPS, nor something that we can fix while on GitHub Pages. We could probably consider implementing HSTS though.
jonah commented 2019-03-31 02:48:42 +00:00
Copy Link

Fixed, we now score an A on Mozilla Observatory and SSL Labs.

Fixed, we now score an A on Mozilla Observatory and SSL Labs.
👍 1
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
approved, waiting for a PR
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
The Invisible Internet Project (I2P)
iOS
low priority
OS
Operating Systems
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
A label for stalebot if it gets added
streaming
Anything related to media streaming.
todo
Tor
Anything covering the Tor network
WIP
active work in progress, do not merge or PR (yet)!
wontfix
Issues or bugs that will not be fixed and/or do not have significant impact on the project.
XMPP
Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
[m]
Matrix protocol
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
Browser Extension related issues
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
Correction of content on the website
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
Firefox & forks, about:config etc.
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
Anything primarily related to site cleanup.
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
Virtual Private Network
🌐 website issue
*Technical* issues with the website.
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
Domain Name System
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
Anything covering a translated version of the site
No Label
🌐 website issue
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
jonah
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#151
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?