Software labels #146

Closed
opened 2017-01-03 20:19:55 +00:00 by ghost · 18 comments
ghost commented 2017-01-03 20:19:55 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I think we should add a label to each piece of software, to prevent people who don't see much difference from choosing the first option (why would they choose the second or the third one?)

  • We'd use Bootstrap labels.
  • I'll create a PR once we decide enough labels
  • 2 kinds of labels
    1. Labels, like "easy to use"
    2. Short notes, like "routes everything through the Tor network by default"
  • Feedback is needed on labels written like this
Section 1 2 3
Browser Recommendation Firefox: popular Brave: natively blocks ads Tor Browser: routes everything through the Tor network by default

Other (not the main 3):

  • TorBirdy: beta or experimental
I think we should add a label to each piece of software, to prevent people who don't see much difference from choosing the first option (why would they choose the second or the third one?) - We'd use Bootstrap labels. - I'll create a PR once we decide enough labels - 2 kinds of labels 1. Labels, like "easy to use" 2. Short notes, like "routes everything through the Tor network by default" - Feedback is needed on labels written *like this* Section | 1 | 2 | 3 ---------- | -- | - | -- Browser Recommendation | **Firefox**: *popular* | **Brave**: natively blocks ads | **Tor Browser**: routes everything through the Tor network by default Other (not the main 3): - TorBirdy: `beta` or `experimental`
bakku commented 2017-01-03 22:55:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Good idea! But when using Labels then they should be short in my opinion and not a description since there is already a description for each tool right? E.g. for your Tor Browser label we could just say "Uses Tor Network".

Good idea! But when using Labels then they should be short in my opinion and not a description since there is already a description for each tool right? E.g. for your Tor Browser label we could just say "Uses Tor Network".
ghost commented 2017-01-03 23:05:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I meant labels and short notes as a separate thing, but had issues describing it, let me edit the post :P. Some tools might need a short description more than a tiny label.

Tool name
Note: short note
<audited> <easy to use>
long description

I meant labels and short notes as a separate thing, but had issues describing it, let me edit the post :P. Some tools might need a short description more than a tiny label. **Tool name** _Note: short note_ \<audited> \<easy to use> long description
kewde commented 2017-07-13 12:06:49 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Would there be a limit on the amount of labels?
inb4: color book 🌈

Would there be a limit on the amount of labels? inb4: color book :rainbow:
ghost commented 2017-07-13 12:10:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I think the limit would be "doesn't look bad"

I think the limit would be "doesn't look bad"
ghost commented 2017-07-13 12:11:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

You could have, say, two longer labels as well as, say, five very short ones.

You could have, say, two longer labels as well as, say, five very short ones.
kewde commented 2017-07-13 12:16:02 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@Shifterovich I think some hard limit to fallback to might be appropriate, "doesn't look bad" is very subjective 😛 I know people are going to want to put more information into this than they can beautifully handle

@Shifterovich I think some hard limit to fallback to might be appropriate, "doesn't look bad" is very subjective :stuck_out_tongue: I know people are going to want to put more information into this than they can beautifully handle
bakku commented 2017-07-13 12:38:19 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I think labels should not span more than one "line" when the site is at its full width. This might be a limit as well...

I think labels should not span more than one "line" when the site is at its full width. This might be a limit as well...
ghost commented 2017-07-13 12:42:18 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

All PRs are reviewed by us. But you're right, we should define some limit. I'd go with three small labels and (or) one larger label/note.

All PRs are reviewed by us. But you're right, we should define some limit. I'd go with three small labels and (or) one larger label/note.
ghost commented 2018-10-26 14:07:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@Vincevrp

@Vincevrp
Vincevrp commented 2018-10-27 12:09:42 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Great idea, though I'm not sure where we'd place them exactly.

Great idea, though I'm not sure where we'd place them exactly.
ghost commented 2018-10-27 13:01:19 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

How about this?

screenshot from 2018-10-27 15-00-38
screenshot from 2018-10-27 15-00-06

How about this? ![screenshot from 2018-10-27 15-00-38](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4354706/47604368-13f97600-d9f9-11e8-8b35-e543474e6b3b.png) ![screenshot from 2018-10-27 15-00-06](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4354706/47604369-14920c80-d9f9-11e8-9765-c126c63b19e2.png)
ghost commented 2018-10-27 14:22:33 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

screenshot from 2018-10-27 16-21-57
screenshot from 2018-10-27 16-21-49
screenshot from 2018-10-27 16-21-32

![screenshot from 2018-10-27 16-21-57](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4354706/47605247-71df8b00-da04-11e8-9e76-4e8aa9437998.png) ![screenshot from 2018-10-27 16-21-49](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4354706/47605248-71df8b00-da04-11e8-83a6-5290655c176d.png) ![screenshot from 2018-10-27 16-21-32](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4354706/47605250-7310b800-da04-11e8-815a-2df48121a042.png)
ghost commented 2018-10-27 14:30:08 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

ca93d61b45 Feature added, but we still need to add the labels to the cards.

https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/commit/ca93d61b45ba8ab7ee934c515ef11fbfd053b2fa Feature added, but we still need to add the labels to the cards.
blacklight447 commented 2019-08-09 21:08:52 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

it seems like the labels are now added, would everyone be okay with closing this issue? @Mikaela @JonahAragon @nitrohorse @Shifterovich ?

it seems like the labels are now added, would everyone be okay with closing this issue? @Mikaela @JonahAragon @nitrohorse @Shifterovich ?
Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 21:21:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I don't think the labels were added or at least https://www.privacytools.io/browsers/#browser which seems to be mockupped is missing those.

Also why is Tor Browser only for experts?

I don't think the labels were added or at least https://www.privacytools.io/browsers/#browser which seems to be mockupped is missing those. Also why is Tor Browser only for experts?
blacklight447 commented 2019-08-09 21:25:38 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I wouldn't know, and i think that one should be removed anyway, as it could scare away people who might really need it.

I wouldn't know, and i think that one should be removed anyway, as it could scare away people who might really need it.
Mikaela commented 2019-08-09 21:50:59 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Resolved in https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/pull/1126
blacklight447 commented 2019-08-09 22:03:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

okay then, closing issue.

okay then, closing issue.
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#146
No description provided.