Change the Privacy? I don't have anything to hide. section #138
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#138
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
While that quote is nice, I suggest adding a better "explaination". Like in @cryptoseb's paper:
I like:
"Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have
nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free
speech because you have nothing to say...."
From Snowden, quoted here:
https://mic.com/articles/119602/in-one-quote-edward-snowden-summed-up-why-our-privacy-is-worth-fighting-for#.Ytqxkvacq
John Wunderlich, BA, MBA
IAPP Fellow of Information Privacy
CISA, CIPM, CIPP/C, PbD Ambassador
@PrivacyCDN https://twitter.com/PrivacyCDN & Privacist
On 29 December 2016 at 13:26, Samuel Shifterovich notifications@github.com
wrote:
--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited.
I included the quote above in my paper because while out for coffee and trying to explain the need for privacy to a 60 some year old man, he said to me: I need privacy from people like you, not from the police. To which I responded: "Great! Don't remove your blinds from your windows then. Just set up some cameras and give the police remote access to the feeds. Make sure you keep them on when you and your wife are fighting, she is taking a bath, or you two are having sex on your birthday. They will love that!" His look was priceless. "But... that's not.. but.." Well go ahead, spit it out. The analogy is accurate. If we would openly allow a Government into our personal lives online, why not allow them into our personal lives in our home? Where is this magic line in the sand that distinguishes the two?
@PrivacyCDN That quote is nice, too, but it's too abstract, people can't relate to that.
Samuel
I take your point, although one suspects that visitors to the
privacytools.io website may not be a 'normal' sample of the population. I'd
worry more about it as troll bait because of the reference to Snowden😑
John Wunderlich, BA, MBA
IAPP Fellow of Information Privacy
CISA, CIPM, CIPP/C, PbD Ambassador
@PrivacyCDN https://twitter.com/PrivacyCDN & Privacist
On 29 December 2016 at 13:54, Samuel Shifterovich notifications@github.com
wrote:
--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited.
Which isn't supposed to be true.
Quoting software criteria:
We're trying to focus on the
'normal' sample of the population
. (we're trying to focus on the entire population, per se, since we, well, recommend software and explain privacy)I guess I don't fall into the
'normal'
sample, but still can't relate to the Glenn's quote as much as to @cryptoseb's.I'm not disagreeing with the intent or the focus, nor do I disagree with
your assessment of the quote.
John Wunderlich, BA, MBA
IAPP Fellow of Information Privacy
CISA, CIPM, CIPP/C, PbD Ambassador
@PrivacyCDN https://twitter.com/PrivacyCDN & Privacist
On 29 December 2016 at 14:11, Samuel Shifterovich notifications@github.com
wrote:
--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited.
I agree. It's time for a change.
What do you think about explaining the fact that people act differently and enjoy less freedom while they are being recorded and monitored?
Like give an example: Did someone ever video tape you without asking you while you were talking? How did it feel? Did it change the whole nature of conversation? Were you uncomfortable? Now imagine everything you do online is being recorded by private and state organizations.
I'm bad at this but I hope you get the idea.
Burung:
What you are talking about is the 'chilling effect' of surveillance. There
is good research and validation of this. For example see
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2412564
John Wunderlich, BA, MBA
IAPP Fellow of Information Privacy
CISA, CIPM, CIPP/C, PbD Ambassador
@PrivacyCDN https://twitter.com/PrivacyCDN & Privacist
On 29 December 2016 at 22:40, Burung Hantu notifications@github.com wrote:
--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited.
@privacytoolsIO I agree. We just need something that people can relate to.
http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ Article 12.
Moreover Electronic Frontier Foundation and its long history tell alot.
This could be quoted somewhere, but it doesn't explain what privacy is - which is the focus, as most people don't understand it and go with the "I have nothing to hide" argument.
Privacy is the right to keep my personal info and my own data private.
MS Windows 10 EULA states that
Microsoft collects, uses and discloses personal information as described here. This allows One Drive data, Cortana searches and MS browser history to be sold to third parties for cash.
I value my privacy and I do not want my info to be sold by microsoft corporation.
#188