🌐 Website Issue | CoC is not linked from participate #1371
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1371
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I think it should be.
Updates on this?
I don't see the CoC there, do you?
I think people can find it themselves from the linked resources.
I think it can lead into a situation where malicious parties claim that the CoC doesn't affect service X, because the PTIO website for service X doesn't mention the CoC.
The CoC is technically linked because of the link to Matrix which leads to https://chat.privacytools.io/ though perhaps the CoC should be mentioned anyway. IMO it would be better to move the CoC to a page on the main site and link to it from all other places.
The new canon source everything should link to is https://wiki.privacytools.io/view/PrivacyTools:Code_of_Conduct (while I do agree and would prefer it to be in the website and git)