Replace DNSCrypt with DNSCrypt-Proxy #1254
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "684"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
Resolves: https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/684
Check List
I have read and understand the contributing guidelines.
I have listed the source code.
This project is free/libre software.
This project has an associated discussion.
Netlify preview for the mainly edited page: https://deploy-preview-1254--privacytools-io.netlify.com/providers/dns/#dns
Code Repository (if applicable): https://github.com/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy
Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!
Built with commit
b7ac2c4caf
https://deploy-preview-1254--privacytools-io.netlify.com
Is it just me or doesn't the dnscrypt proxy not have an icon yet?
Lol wow just looking in their repo: https://github.com/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/blob/master/logo.svg Found it!
seems good for merging then!
Sorry that I am not more helpful, I feel tired as it's midnight and I have been suffering migraine since I woke up.
It works as a local DNS server, but I am not sure I am entirely happy with the tagline.
I am not sure on this description.
The
operatingsystem="link"
things won't actually do anything as you can see in the preview, so I think they should be removed.Same, should we leave off a tag line for this?
Gotcha, that makes sense. Wasn’t sure if we want these filled out even in these cases but will remove them.
It's possible, yeah:
Hmm what about this description (taken in part from Arch's wiki and updated):
That would work or maybe just leaving the old "Tool"
I like it, other than the last part
I don't know what they mean by "compatible with DNSSEC" unless it means "you can configure dnscrypt-proxy to require DNSSEC capable servers from sources file" as there is the "but" that dnscrypt-proxy won't validate DNSSEC by itself.
Yeah, I just see that's a bit odd wording...
I can just leave it out.