dns/#icanndns: list the hosting provider / CDN #1221
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1221
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
#1218 points that 5/11 of the DNS resolvers we list are behind Cloudflare. In the team chat there is concensus that it may not be so good idea to only focus on Cloudflare while there are a lot other CDN providers too that are more invisible and I view that if every DNS provider is hosted with e.g. DigitalOcean, it's not much better for decentralization.
Thus I propose instead adding a new column for hosting provider where it can be clearly distinguished
(some like Quad9 might have "multiple" or "several" due to being at individual IXPs and I am only aware of DNS Leak Test naming it as WoodyNet and TREX).Edit: the strikethroughed part doesn't apply with the testing method that is as accurate as
whois <ip address
.Assigning @nitrohorse who is author of the table and knows it the best.
Here's a some info we could use for the providers currently listed:
AdGuard
BlahDNS
whois 2a0a:e5c0:2:2:0:c8ff:fe68:bf48
whois 2001:19f0:7001:1ded:5400:01ff:fe90:945b
whois 108.61.201.119
whois 159.69.198.101
Cloudflare
whois 1.1.1.1
CZ.NIC
whois 193.17.47.1
whois 185.43.135.1
dnswarden
Foundation for Applied Privacy
whois 37.252.185.232
whois 2a00:63c1:a:229::3
nextdns
whois 45.90.28.0
), IPv6PowerDNS
whois 136.144.215.158
Quad9
whois 9.9.9.9
whois 149.112.112.112
whois 2620:fe::fe
whois 2620:fe::9
SecureDNS
whois 146.185.167.43
whois 2a03:b0c0:0:1010::e9a:3001
UncensoredDNS
whois 91.239.100.100
whois 2001:67c:28a4::
whois 89.233.43.71
whois 2a01:3a0:53:53::
I think we could possibly also mark it as Quad9/self as PCH is one of their founders.
I am happy to see that only one provider is at DigitalOcean and my example was wrong 😃
Shower questions: should the hosting providers also have country where they are based on mentioned?
I would say yes.
NixNet DNS
whois 198.251.90.114
whois 209.141.34.95
The RIPE & APNIC (excl. cloudflare 1.1.1.1 as the org is part of the project) thing is irrelevant, it's just a organization handing out IP addresses, not a hosting provider.
For UncensoredDNS, I'd list all the PoPs (points of presence), not just single one (the danish one that is not linked to anycast):
They're listed at https://blog.uncensoreddns.org/dns-servers/
Also: BuyVM is a brand of FranTech, Vultr is a brand of Choopa
Excellent, thanks for the feedback @theel0ja; I've updated https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/pull/1261 to account for your suggestions.