🗄️ DNS provider suggestion | NixNet #1206
Labels
No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1206
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Basic Information
Name: NixNet
Filtering: No
Privacy policy: https://nixnet.xyz/privacy/
Protocols: DoT (853)
Server/Location: Anycast, Luxembourg, New York, Las Vegas
Source: - (Unbound)
Type: Informal collective (part of Librehosters, see #816 )
Website: https://nixnet.xyz/dns/
Description
From what I understood they are smaller indepedent provider and thus good for decentralization. They also have servers in the US which our listing is currently missing.
I opened an issue about features I am unsure of: https://git.nixnet.xyz/NixNet/NixNet/issues/2 (including whether IP addresses get logged)
Required features:
Desired features
They also recommend lelux.fi which leaves some details unclear to me,
but I get the picture that they don't support DNSSEC, so I am not opening an issue for now.Edit:
poke @amolith
It seems silly to add another DNS server to an already packed list, especially when it doesn't support all the features that would make it fully privacy focused.
TODO
I set these up a while ago and I couldn't remember what I had configured. As I was looking around, I found that all the features requested are enabled; Unbound does DNSSEC validation and QNAME minimisation by default. I've added a new header on the DNS page with a list of the features as well as mentioned the Unbound verbosity in the Privacy Policy
EDIT
The wording in my privacy policy was inaccurate; previously, it said "Unbound query logs are enabled" and now it says "Unbound debug logs are enabled". Verbosity is set to 1 by default and I didn't mess with that.
Adblocked DoH is active and uncensored is in progress.
https://nixnet.xyz/dns/
Thanks for the update (and https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/pull/1321).
Is Anycast DoH missing on purpose? I see that only Adblock anycast has DoH listed.
The first Anycast section is DNS without Adblock (uncensored) and that's what I'm working on implementing DoH with. You'll notice that the specific locations only list that as well and not uncensored.
I'm in the process of moving all of my documentation to a new website; DNS information can be found here with relevant links to other sections. I have git set up for the backend so all the pages are plain MD files stored on Gitea
Change of URL again (sorry!); I switched from Wiki.js to MediaWiki because the former relies to heavily on JS and this information needs to be accessible to anyone. Most information can be found here but the privacy policy is on a separate page. I'm going to set them all up with proper categories in the near future.
shocked pikachu face