privacyguides
/
privacytools.io
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 304 Pull Requests 47 Activity

Document the criteria for DNS servers #1111

Merged
Mikaela merged 8 commits from dns-criteria into master 2019-08-09 20:10:20 +00:00
Conversation 3 Commits 8 Files Changed 1 +36
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 07:54:28 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Description

Resolves: #1109

Preview

https://github.com/Mikaela/privacytools.io/issues/new/choose

## Description Resolves: #1109 ## Preview https://github.com/Mikaela/privacytools.io/issues/new/choose
jonah reviewed 2019-08-07 07:54:28 +00:00
netlify[bot] commented 2019-08-07 07:55:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Deploy preview for privacytools-io ready!

Built with commit 9e007f11be

https://deploy-preview-1111--privacytools-io.netlify.com

Deploy preview for *privacytools-io* ready! Built with commit 9e007f11be0cedb5bfdd20f088b74be7d069dc76 https://deploy-preview-1111--privacytools-io.netlify.com
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-07 07:59:36 +00:00
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Ok, I was missing a lot when getting distracted

Ok, I was missing a lot when getting distracted
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 07:55:53 +00:00

Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)

Todo: read privacy policies of "some" logging (#1097)
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 07:56:10 +00:00

Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?

Todo: small explanation or a link how to test it?
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 07:56:30 +00:00

Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.

Todo: testing instruction in case the provider doesn't advertise this.
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
@ -0,0 +17,4 @@
**Source:** <!-- link to the source code, preferred, but optional -->
**Type:** <!-- Non-profit, commercial, hobby project? -->
**Website:**
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 07:58:59 +00:00

Todo: Server location? Privacy policy? Type? Protocols? Filtering?

Todo: Server location? Privacy policy? Type? Protocols? Filtering?
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-07 08:23:03 +00:00
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Does this look OK, or am I putting too many details, or too little details? Is it cluttered, am I saying too much by telling the issue reporter to feel free to overwrite comments?

Does this look OK, or am I putting too many details, or too little details? Is it cluttered, am I saying too much by telling the issue reporter to feel free to overwrite comments?
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 08:29:00 +00:00

@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?

@nitrohorse Could we actually boost DNSSEC into a required feature as everyone on #1097 appears to support it?
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 13:47:11 +00:00

Yeah, I think so 👍🏼

Yeah, I think so 👍🏼
Mikaela commented 2019-08-07 16:04:10 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

I guess this is ready for review

I guess this is ready for review
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 16:19:31 +00:00

Could we make this also a checkbox?

Could we make this also a checkbox?
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 16:20:45 +00:00

Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion

Sure, done, I was thinking of making it obvious that all features are checked, but I guess this is nice for comparsion
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 16:21:06 +00:00

Do we mean “Android 9+?”

Do we mean “Android 9+?”
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 16:21:30 +00:00

I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish

I tried to say newer than 9, but I can change it to that too if you wish
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 16:21:39 +00:00

I guess consistency

I guess consistency
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-07 16:23:02 +00:00
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

This LGTM 👍🏼

This LGTM 👍🏼
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-07 16:23:48 +00:00

Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼

Ah gotcha, okay, no worries; you can leave it 👌🏼
ghbjklhv1 (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-08 22:08:29 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
@ -0,0 +23,4 @@
<!-- Why should we list your suggestion? Anything else, that you wish us to know? -->
### Required features:
ghbjklhv1 (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-08 22:07:56 +00:00

Why not add Prioritize DNS with TOR/I2P When Available?

Also, I think P2P DNS Support is a must:
Consider adding Must Support P2P DNS (i.e NameCoin)

  • Just wanted to throw it out there
Why not add `Prioritize DNS with TOR/I2P When Available`? Also, I think P2P DNS Support is a must: Consider adding `Must Support P2P DNS (i.e NameCoin)` - Just wanted to throw it out there
ghbjklhv1 (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-08 22:09:51 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
@ -0,0 +23,4 @@
<!-- Why should we list your suggestion? Anything else, that you wish us to know? -->
### Required features:
ghbjklhv1 (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-08 22:09:51 +00:00

Censorship may also be a concern, have you considered adding Net Neutral to the list?

Censorship may also be a concern, have you considered adding `Net Neutral` to the list?
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-08 22:16:53 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
@ -0,0 +23,4 @@
<!-- Why should we list your suggestion? Anything else, that you wish us to know? -->
### Required features:
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-08 22:16:52 +00:00

Why not add Prioritize DNS with TOR/I2P When Available?

basically there are three conflicting meanins for the word "DNS with Tor" and we aren't aware of any resolvers that support I2P.

Also, I think P2P DNS Support is a must:
Consider adding Must Support P2P DNS (i.e NameCoin)

How widely used are they, how is the encryption and how is it P2P if everyone is just using a DNS server that happens to resolve it?

Censorship may also be a concern, have you considered adding Net Neutral to the list?

How do you define censorship or Net Neutral as opposed to filtering which is already on the list?

> Why not add Prioritize DNS with TOR/I2P When Available? * https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/pull/1097/#discussion_r311923362 * https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/pull/1097/#issuecomment-519705827 basically there are three conflicting meanins for the word "DNS with Tor" and we aren't aware of any resolvers that support I2P. > Also, I think P2P DNS Support is a must: > Consider adding Must Support P2P DNS (i.e NameCoin) How widely used are they, how is the encryption and how is it P2P if everyone is just using a DNS server that happens to resolve it? > Censorship may also be a concern, have you considered adding Net Neutral to the list? How do you define censorship or Net Neutral *as opposed to* filtering which is already on the list?
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-09 03:53:28 +00:00

Small suggestion:

[ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` -->
Small suggestion: ```markdown [ ] supports QNAME minimization <!-- if you have access to the dig command, `dig +short txt qnamemintest.internet.nl` --> ```
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-09 04:27:02 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
@ -0,0 +23,4 @@
<!-- Why should we list your suggestion? Anything else, that you wish us to know? -->
### Required features:
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-09 04:27:02 +00:00

Censorship may also be a concern, have you considered adding Net Neutral to the list?

Hmm how would AdGuard and Quad9 for instance be classified then as under this criteria since they filter ads/trackers/malware? I think filtering (when expected) is useful for a subset of PTIO's users' threat models.

> Censorship may also be a concern, have you considered adding Net Neutral to the list? Hmm how would AdGuard and Quad9 for instance be classified then as under this criteria since they filter ads/trackers/malware? I think filtering (when expected) is useful for a subset of PTIO's users' threat models.
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/7_DNS_provider.md
Mikaela (Migrated from github.com) commented 2019-08-09 09:28:15 +00:00

Done

Done
blacklight447 commented 2019-08-09 10:20:50 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Seems alright to me.

Seems alright to me.
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2019-08-09 14:43:36 +00:00
nitrohorse (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

LGTM

LGTM
blacklight447 (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2019-08-09 20:08:03 +00:00
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.
Reviewers
No reviewers
jonah
nitrohorse
blacklight447
Labels
Clear labels   
🔍🤖 Search Engines

   
approved

approved, waiting for a PR

  
dependencies

Pull requests that update a dependency file

  
duplicate

   
feedback wanted

   
high priority

   
I2P

The Invisible Internet Project (I2P)

  
iOS

   
low priority

   
OS

Operating Systems

  
Self-contained networks

   
Social media

   
stale

A label for stalebot if it gets added

  
streaming

Anything related to media streaming.

  
todo

   
Tor

Anything covering the Tor network

  
WIP

active work in progress, do not merge or PR (yet)!

  
wontfix

Issues or bugs that will not be fixed and/or do not have significant impact on the project.

  
XMPP

Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol

  
[m]

Matrix protocol

  
₿ cryptocurrency

   
ℹ️ help wanted

   
↔️ file sharing

   
⚙️ web extensions

Browser Extension related issues

  
✨ enhancement

   
❌ software removal

   
💬 discussion

   
🤖 Android

   
🐛 bug

   
💢 conflicting

   
📝 correction

Correction of content on the website

  
🆘 critical

   
📧 email

   
🔒 file encryption

   
📁 file storage

   
🦊 Firefox

Firefox & forks, about:config etc.

  
💻 hardware

   
🌐 hosting

   
🏠 housekeeping

Anything primarily related to site cleanup.

  
🔐 password managers

   
🧰 productivity tools

   
🔎 research required

   
🌐 Social News Aggregators

   
🆕 software suggestion

   
👥 team chat

   
🔒 VPN

Virtual Private Network

  
🌐 website issue

*Technical* issues with the website.

  
🚫 Windows

   
👁️ browsers

   
🖊️ digital notebooks

   
🗄️ DNS

Domain Name System

  
🗨️ instant messaging (im)

   
🇦🇶 translations

Anything covering a translated version of the site

No Label
🔍🤖 Search Engines
approved
dependencies
duplicate
feedback wanted
high priority
I2P
iOS
low priority
OS
Self-contained networks
Social media
stale
streaming
todo
Tor
WIP
wontfix
XMPP
[m]
₿ cryptocurrency
ℹ️ help wanted
↔️ file sharing
⚙️ web extensions
✨ enhancement
❌ software removal
💬 discussion
🤖 Android
🐛 bug
💢 conflicting
📝 correction
🆘 critical
📧 email
🔒 file encryption
📁 file storage
🦊 Firefox
💻 hardware
🌐 hosting
🏠 housekeeping
🔐 password managers
🧰 productivity tools
🔎 research required
🌐 Social News Aggregators
🆕 software suggestion
👥 team chat
🔒 VPN
🌐 website issue
🚫 Windows
👁️ browsers
🖊️ digital notebooks
🗄️ DNS
🗨️ instant messaging (im)
🇦🇶 translations
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: privacyguides/privacytools.io#1111
No description provided.
Delete Branch "dns-criteria"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?