New Crowdin translations by GitHub Action

2026-09-30 18:12:33 +00:00 · 2026-09-14 22:33:45 +00:00
parent 1721c52184
commit 6e097f7f40
77 changed files with 77 additions and 46 deletions
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -328,6 +328,7 @@ Firefox يوفّر إعدادات قوية لحماية الخصوصية، مث

 - اختر **Extensions (no fallback)** ضمن *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - اختر **Extensions (no fallback)** ضمن *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### الإضافات (قم بإيقاف كل الإضافات المدمجة غير الضرورية بالنسبة لك)

@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ schema:

 </div>

-صمِّم متصفِّح تور لمكافحة التبصيم، أو كشف هويَّتك حسب ضبط متصفِّحك. ولهذا السبب، من المهم جدا أن **لا تغير** إعدادات متصفح Tor خارج [المستويات الأمنية المضمنة](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings)، لأن أي تعديل قد يعرضك لخطر كشف الهوية. إذا قمت بتغيير مستوى الأمان، **من الضروري** إعادة تشغيل متصفح Tor لتطبيق التغييرات بشكل صحيح قبل مواصلة التصفح. وإلا، فقد لا تُطبَّق [إعدادات الأمان بشكل كامل](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw)، مما قد يعرّضك لخطر التتبع واستغلال الثغرات، مقارنة بما تتوقعه من مستوى الأمان الذي اخترته.
+صمِّم متصفِّح تور لمكافحة التبصيم، أو كشف هويَّتك حسب ضبط متصفِّحك. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. وإلا، فقد لا تُطبَّق [إعدادات الأمان بشكل كامل](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw)، مما قد يعرّضك لخطر التتبع واستغلال الثغرات، مقارنة بما تتوقعه من مستوى الأمان الذي اخترته.

 بالإضافة إلى إمكانية تثبيت متصفح Tor مباشرة على جهازك، هناك أيضا أنظمة تشغيل صُممت خصيصا لاستخدام شبكة Tor، مثل [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) ضمن [Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os)، والتي توفر مستوى أعلى من الأمان والحماية مقارنة باستخدام متصفح Tor فقط.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Funkce Web3 může potenciálně zvýšit riziko zanechání otisku a zvětšit

 - V *Základní peněženka Ethereum* vyberte **Rozšíření (bez náhradního řešení)**
 - V *Základní peněženka Solana* vyberte **Rozšíření (bez náhradního řešení)**
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Rozšíření

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Die Web3-Funktionen von Brave können deinen Browser-Fingerabdruck und deine Ang

 - Wähle **Erweiterungen (kein Backup)** unter *Standard-Ethereum-Wallet*
 - Wähle **Erweiterungen (kein Backup)** unter *Standard-Solana-Wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Erweiterungen

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Du solltest **niemals** zusätzliche Erweiterungen für den Tor-Browser installi

 </div>

-Der Tor-Browser wurde entwickelt, um Fingerprinting zu verhindern, oder um dich anhand deiner Browserkonfiguration zu identifizieren. Daher ist es absolut notwendig, dass du den Browser in **keiner Weise**veränderst, abgesehen von der Anpassung der [Standard-Sicherheitsstufen](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. Sonst werden [die Sicherheitseinstellungen nicht vollständig angewendet](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), was zu höheren Risiken von Fingerprinting und Angriffen führen kann, als was du von der Einstellung erwartet hast.
+Der Tor-Browser wurde entwickelt, um Fingerprinting zu verhindern, oder um dich anhand deiner Browserkonfiguration zu identifizieren. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. Sonst werden [die Sicherheitseinstellungen nicht vollständig angewendet](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), was zu höheren Risiken von Fingerprinting und Angriffen führen kann, als was du von der Einstellung erwartet hast.

 Zusätzlich zur Installation des Tor-Browsers auf deinem Computer, gibt es auch Betriebssysteme, die speziell für die Verbindung mit dem Tor-Netzwerk entwickelt wurden, wie [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) oder [Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os), die noch mehr Sicherheit und Schutz bieten als alleine der Standard-Tor-Browser.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Es fundamental comprender la diferencia entre eludir la censura y eludir la dete

 ### Tor Browser no es el navegador más *seguro*

-El anonimato a menudo puede estar reñido con la seguridad: el anonimato de Tor requiere que cada usuario sea idéntico, lo que crea una monocultura (por ejemplo, los mismos bugs están presentes en todos los usuarios del Navegador Tor). Como regla general de ciberseguridad, las monoculturas suelen considerarse malas: La seguridad a través de la diversidad (de la que carece Tor) proporciona una segmentación natural al limitar las vulnerabilidades a grupos más pequeños, y por lo tanto suele ser deseable, pero esta diversidad también es menos buena para el anonimato.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Adicionalmente, Tor Browser está basado en la versión de Soporte Extendido de Firefox, que solo recibe parches para vulnerabilidades consideradas *Críticas* y *Altas* (no *Medias* y *Bajas*). Esto significa que los atacantes podrían (por ejemplo):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Las funciones Web3 de Brave pueden aumentar potencialmente la huella digital de

 - Selecciona **Extensiones (sin copia de seguridad)** en *Cartera predeterminada de Ethereum*
 - Selecciona **Extensiones (sin copia de seguridad)** en *Cartera predeterminada de Solana*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensiones

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Si un anonimato más completo es primordial para tu situación, deberías **solo

 </div>

-El navegador Tor está diseñado para evitar la toma de huellas digirtales o tu identificación debido a la configuración de tu navegador. Por lo tanto, es imperativo que **no** modifiques el navegador más allá de los [niveles de seguridad](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings) predeterminados. Cuando modifiques la configuración del nivel de seguridad, **deberás** reiniciar siempre el navegador antes de seguir utilizándolo. De lo contrario, [es posible que la configuración de seguridad no se aplique en su totalidad](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), exponiéndote a un riesgo de fingerprinting y exploits mayor de lo que cabría esperar en función de la configuración elegida.
+El navegador Tor está diseñado para evitar la toma de huellas digirtales o tu identificación debido a la configuración de tu navegador. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. De lo contrario, [es posible que la configuración de seguridad no se aplique en su totalidad](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), exponiéndote a un riesgo de fingerprinting y exploits mayor de lo que cabría esperar en función de la configuración elegida.

 Además de instalar Tor Browser en tu ordenador directamente, también hay sistemas operativos diseñados específicamente para conectarse a la red Tor como [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) en [Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os), que proporcionan incluso mayor seguridad y protecciones que el Navegador Tor estándar por sí solo.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Il est essentiel de comprendre la différence entre contourner la censure et éc

 ### Le Navigateur Tor n'est pas le navigateur le plus *sûr*

-L'anonymat est souvent en contradiction avec la sécurité : l'anonymat de Tor exige que chaque utilisateur soit identique, ce qui crée une monoculture (les mêmes bugs sont présents chez tous les utilisateurs du navigateur Tor). En matière de cybersécurité, les monocultures sont généralement considérées comme mauvaises : la sécurité par la diversité (qui fait défaut à Tor) permet une segmentation naturelle en limitant les vulnérabilités à des groupes plus restreints, et est donc généralement souhaitable, mais cette diversité est également moins bonne pour l'anonymat.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 En outre, le Navigateur Tor est basé sur les versions Extended Support Release de Firefox, qui ne reçoivent des correctifs que pour les vulnérabilités considérées comme *Critique* et *Élevée* (et non pour celles *Moyenne* et *Faible*). Cela signifie que les attaquants pourraient (par exemple) :

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Les fonctionnalités Web3 de Brave peuvent potentiellement ajouter à l'empreint

 - Sélectionnez **Extensions (no fallback)** sous *Portefeuille Ethereum par défaut*
 - Sélectionnez **Extensions (no fallback)** sous *Default Solana wallet (portefeuille Solana par défaut)*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Vous ne devriez **jamais** installer des extensions supplémentaires sur le Navi

 </div>

-Le Navigateur Tor est conçu pour empêcher la capture d'empreintes numérique, ou l'identification en fonction de la configuration de votre navigateur. Il est donc impératif de **ne pas** modifier le navigateur au-delà des [niveaux de sécurité](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings) par défaut. Lorsque vous réglez le niveau de sécurité, vous **devez** toujours redémarrez le navigateur avant de continuer à l'utiliser. Dans le cas contraire, [les paramètres de sécurité peuvent ne pas être entièrement appliqués](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), ce qui vous expose à un risque plus élevé de captures d'empreinte et de vulnérabilités que vous ne l'auriez imaginé sur la base des paramètres choisis.
+Le Navigateur Tor est conçu pour empêcher la capture d'empreintes numérique, ou l'identification en fonction de la configuration de votre navigateur. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. Dans le cas contraire, [les paramètres de sécurité peuvent ne pas être entièrement appliqués](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), ce qui vous expose à un risque plus élevé de captures d'empreinte et de vulnérabilités que vous ne l'auriez imaginé sur la base des paramètres choisis.

 Outre installer le Navigateur Tor sur votre ordinateur, il existe également des systèmes d'exploitation conçus spécifiquement pour se connecter au réseau Tor tels que [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) sur [Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os), qui offrent une sécurité et des protections encore plus importantes que le Navigateur Tor standard.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Ha a teljes anonimitás a legfontosabb számodra, akkor **csak** az asztali Tor

 </div>

-A Tor böngészőt úgy tervezték, hogy megakadályozza az ujjlenyomatolást, vagyis a beazonosításodat a böngésző konfigurációja alapján. Ezért elengedhetetlen, hogy **ne** módosítsd a böngészőt az alapértelmezett [biztonsági szinteken](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings) túl. When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. Otherwise, [the security settings may not be fully applied](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), putting you at a higher risk of fingerprinting and exploits than you may expect based on the setting chosen.
+A Tor böngészőt úgy tervezték, hogy megakadályozza az ujjlenyomatolást, vagyis a beazonosításodat a böngésző konfigurációja alapján. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. Otherwise, [the security settings may not be fully applied](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), putting you at a higher risk of fingerprinting and exploits than you may expect based on the setting chosen.

 A Tor Böngésző közvetlen számítógépre telepítése mellett vannak olyan operációs rendszerek is, amelyeket kifejezetten a Tor-hálózathoz való csatlakozásra terveztek, mint például a [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) a [Qubes OS-en](desktop.md#qubes-os), amelyek még nagyobb biztonságot és védelmet nyújtanak, mint a hagyományos Tor Browser önmagában.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Fitur Web3 Brave berpotensi manambah fingerprinting browser Anda dan permukaan s

 - Pilih **Extensions (no fallback)** di bawah *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Pilih **Extensions (no fallback)** di bawah *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Ekstensi

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Anda sebaiknya **jangan pernah** memasang ekstensi tambahan apa pun pada Tor Bro

 </div>

-Tor Browser dirancang untuk mencegah fingerprinting, atau mengidentifikasi Anda berdasarkan konfigurasi peramban Anda. Oleh karena itu, sangat penting bagi Anda untuk **tidak** memodifikasi peramban di luar [tingkat keamanan](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings) bawaan. Saat menyesuaikan tingkat keamanan, Anda **harus** selalu memulai ulang peramban sebelum melanjutkan penggunaannya. Jika tidak, [pengaturan keamanan mungkin tidak sepenuhnya diterapkan](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), sehingga Anda berada pada risiko fingerprinting dan eksploitasi yang lebih tinggi daripada yang Anda harapkan berdasarkan pengaturan yang dipilih.
+Tor Browser dirancang untuk mencegah fingerprinting, atau mengidentifikasi Anda berdasarkan konfigurasi peramban Anda. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. Jika tidak, [pengaturan keamanan mungkin tidak sepenuhnya diterapkan](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), sehingga Anda berada pada risiko fingerprinting dan eksploitasi yang lebih tinggi daripada yang Anda harapkan berdasarkan pengaturan yang dipilih.

 Selain aplikasi yang terancam di bawah ini, ada juga sistem operasi yang dirancang khusus untuk terhubung ke jaringan Tor seperti [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) di [Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os), yang menyediakan keamanan dan perlindungan yang lebih besar daripada Tor Browser standar.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Esistono altri trasporti collegabili oltre questi tre, ma si affidano tipicament

 ### Il Browser Tor non è il browser più *sicuro*

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). Come regola generale di cybersicurezza, le monoculture sono generalmente considerate come negative: la sicurezza tramite la diversità (che manca a Tor), fornisce la segmentazione naturale, limitando le vulnerabilità dei gruppi più piccoli, ed è dunque più desiderabile, pur essendo a costo dell'anonimato.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Inoltre, Tor Browser si basa sulle build delle Versioni di Supporto Esteso di Firefox, che ricevono correzioni soltanto per le vulnerabilità considerate *Critiche* ed *Elevate* (non *Medie* e *Basse*). Ciò significa che dei malintenzionati potrebbero, ad esempio:

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Le funzionalità Web3 di Brave possono potenzialmente aumentare il fingerprint d

 - Selezionare **Estensioni** sotto *Portafoglio Ethereum predefinito*
 - Selezionare **Estensioni** sotto *Portafoglio Solana predefinito*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Estensioni

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Non dovresti **mai** installare alcun'estensione aggiuntiva su Tor Browser o mod

 </div>

-Tor Browser è progettato per impedire il fingerprinting, o la tua identificazione secondo la configurazione del tuo browser. Pertanto, è imperativo **non** modificare il browser oltre i livelli di [sicurezza](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings) predefiniti. Quando modifichi il livello di sicurezza, **devi** sempre riavviare il browser prima di continuare a usarlo. In caso contrario, [le impostazioni di sicurezza potrebbero non essere applicate completamente](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), esponendoti a un rischio di fingerprinting e di exploit più elevato di quello previsto in base all'impostazione da te scelta.
+Tor Browser è progettato per impedire il fingerprinting, o la tua identificazione secondo la configurazione del tuo browser. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. In caso contrario, [le impostazioni di sicurezza potrebbero non essere applicate completamente](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), esponendoti a un rischio di fingerprinting e di exploit più elevato di quello previsto in base all'impostazione da te scelta.

 Oltre a installare Tor Browser direttamente sul tuo computer, esistono inoltre dei sistemi operativi specificamente progettati per connettersi alla rete di Tor, come [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) su [Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os), che forniscono sicurezza e protezioni persino maggiori, rispetto al solo Tor Browser standard.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ BraveのWeb3機能はブラウザのフィンガープリントとアタック

 - *デフォルトのEthereumウォレット*の**拡張機能（フォールバックなし）**を選択
 - *デフォルトのSolanaウォレット*の**拡張機能（フォールバックなし）**を選択
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### 拡張機能

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Firefoxでおすすめされているものを含め、Tor Browserに追加の

 </div>

-Tor Browserはフィンガープリントを防止するよう設計されており、不用意にブラウザの設定を変更するとあなたは特定されやすくなってしまいます。 そのため、デフォルトの[セキュリティレベル](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings)を調整する以外の変更は**行うべきではありません**。 セキュリティレベルを変更する際には、使い続ける前にブラウザを再起動**しなければなりません**。 再起動しなければ、[セキュリティ設定は完全に適用されない可能性があり](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw)、選択した設定よりもフィンガープリンティングやエクスプロイトのリスクが高くなります。
+Tor Browserはフィンガープリントを防止するよう設計されており、不用意にブラウザの設定を変更するとあなたは特定されやすくなってしまいます。 Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. 再起動しなければ、[セキュリティ設定は完全に適用されない可能性があり](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw)、選択した設定よりもフィンガープリンティングやエクスプロイトのリスクが高くなります。

 Tor Browserを直接コンピューターにインストールするだけではなく、[Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os)上の[Whonix](desktop.md#whonix)のようにTorネットワークに接続するためのOSもあり、Tor Browser単体で使うよりもよりセキュリティを強化することができます。

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Tor 브라우저에서는 **절대로** 추가 확장 프로그램을 설치하

 </div>

-Tor 브라우저는 핑거프린팅 및 브라우저 설정 기반 사용자 식별을 방지하도록 설계되었습니다. 따라서, 브라우저를 기본 [보안 수준](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings)을 벗어나는 수정을 해서는 **안 됩니다**. When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. Otherwise, [the security settings may not be fully applied](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), putting you at a higher risk of fingerprinting and exploits than you may expect based on the setting chosen.
+Tor 브라우저는 핑거프린팅 및 브라우저 설정 기반 사용자 식별을 방지하도록 설계되었습니다. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. Otherwise, [the security settings may not be fully applied](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), putting you at a higher risk of fingerprinting and exploits than you may expect based on the setting chosen.

 Tor Browser를 컴퓨터에 설치해서 연결하는 방법도 있지만, [Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os)의 [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix)처럼 Tor 네트워크에 연결하기 위한 용도로 만들어진 운영 체제도 있습니다. 이러한 연결 방식은 Tor Browser를 사용하는 것보다 더 강력한 보안을 제공합니다.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ De Web3-functies van Brave kunnen mogelijk de vingerafdruk van jouw browser en h

 - Selecteer **Extensions (no fallback)** onder *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Selecteer **Extensions (no fallback)** onder *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensies

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Ważne jest rozróżnienie między omijaniem cenzury a unikaniem wykrycia. To pi

 ### Tor Browser nie jest naj*bezpieczniejszą* przeglądarką

-Anonimowość często stoi w sprzeczności z bezpieczeństwem: anonimowość sieci Tor wymaga, by wszyscy użytkownicy byli identyczni, co tworzy monokulturę (np. te same błędy występują u wszystkich użytkowników przeglądarki Tor Browser). Z punktu widzenia cyberbezpieczeństwa monokultury zwykle uznawane są za złe: bezpieczeństwo przez różnorodność (którego Tor nie zapewnia) naturalnie dzieli środowisko i ogranicza zasięg podatności, co z reguły jest pożądane, choć mniej korzystne dla anonimowości.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Ponadto przeglądarka Tor Browser bazuje na wydaniach Firefoksa o wydłużonym wsparciu (Extended Support Release – ESR), które otrzymują poprawki tylko dla podatności sklasyfikowanych jako *krytyczne* i *wysokie* (nie dla *średnich* i *niskich*). Oznacza to, że atakujący mogą (na przykład):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Funkcje Web3 w przeglądarce Brave mogą potencjalnie zwiększyć unikalność T

 - Wybierz **Rozszerzenia (bez kopii zapasowej)** w sekcji *Domyślny portfel Ethereum*
 - Wybierz **Rozszerzenia (bez kopii zapasowej)** w sekcji *Domyślny portfel Solana*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Rozszerzenia

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Jeżeli w Twojej sytuacji pełna anonimowość jest kluczowa, zalecamy **wyłąc

 </div>

-Przeglądarka Tor Browser została zaprojektowana tak, by zapobiegać fingerprintingowi, czyli identyfikacji użytkownika na podstawie konfiguracji jego przeglądarki. Z tego powodu **nie należy** wprowadzać żadnych zmian w przeglądarce poza wybraniem domyślnych [poziomów bezpieczeństwa](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). Po każdej zmianie poziomu bezpieczeństwa **koniecznie** należy ponownie uruchomić przeglądarkę przed dalszym korzystaniem. W przeciwnym razie [ustawienia bezpieczeństwa mogą nie zostać w pełni zastosowane](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), co zwiększa ryzyko identyfikacji lub wykorzystania luk, mimo że wybrany poziom ochrony może sugerować coś innego.
+Przeglądarka Tor Browser została zaprojektowana tak, by zapobiegać fingerprintingowi, czyli identyfikacji użytkownika na podstawie konfiguracji jego przeglądarki. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. W przeciwnym razie [ustawienia bezpieczeństwa mogą nie zostać w pełni zastosowane](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), co zwiększa ryzyko identyfikacji lub wykorzystania luk, mimo że wybrany poziom ochrony może sugerować coś innego.

 Oprócz instalacji przeglądarki Tor Browser bezpośrednio na komputerze, istnieją również systemy operacyjne zaprojektowane specjalnie do korzystania z sieci Tor, takie jak [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) działający w środowisku [Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os). Oferują one jeszcze wyższy poziom bezpieczeństwa i ochrony niż sam Tor Browser.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ As funcionalidades Web3 do Brave potencialmente podem acrescentar à 'impressão

 - Selecione **Extensões (sem fallback)** sob *carteira Ethereum padrão*
 - Selecione **Extensões (sem fallback)** sob *Carteira Solana padrão*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensões

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Você nunca deve instalar outras extensões no Navegador Tor ou editar as config

 </div>

-O Navegador Tor foi projetado para evitar a coleta de suas "impressões digitais" ou a identificação do usuário com base na configuração do navegador. Portanto, é imperativo que você **não** modifique o navegador além do padrão de níveis de segurança [](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. Caso contrário, [as configurações de segurança poderão não ser totalmente aplicadas](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), colocando-o em um risco maior de exposição da sua identidade digital e exploits do que o esperado com base na configuração escolhida.
+O Navegador Tor foi projetado para evitar a coleta de suas "impressões digitais" ou a identificação do usuário com base na configuração do navegador. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. Caso contrário, [as configurações de segurança poderão não ser totalmente aplicadas](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), colocando-o em um risco maior de exposição da sua identidade digital e exploits do que o esperado com base na configuração escolhida.

 Além de instalar o Navegador Tor diretamente no seu computador, existem também sistemas operacionais projetados especificamente para se conectar à rede Tor, como [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) na [Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os), que oferecem segurança e proteção ainda maiores do que o Navegador Tor padrão sozinho.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave позволяет выбирать дополнительные филь

 - Выберите **Extensions (no fallback)** в разделе *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Выберите **Extensions (no fallback)** в разделе *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Расширения

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ schema:

 </div>

-Браузер Tor предназначен для предотвращения "отпечатков браузера", или идентификации тебя на основе конфигурации твоего браузера. Поэтому крайне важно, чтобы ты **не** изменял браузер за пределами стандартных [уровней безопасности](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). При изменении настройки уровня безопасности ты **обязательно** должен перезапустить браузер перед продолжением его использования. В противном случае [настройки безопасности могут быть применены не полностью](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), что подвергает вас более высокому риску фингерпринтинга и эксплойтов, чем вы можете ожидать, исходя из выбранных настроек.
+Браузер Tor предназначен для предотвращения "отпечатков браузера", или идентификации тебя на основе конфигурации твоего браузера. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. В противном случае [настройки безопасности могут быть применены не полностью](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), что подвергает вас более высокому риску фингерпринтинга и эксплойтов, чем вы можете ожидать, исходя из выбранных настроек.

 В дополнение к прямой установке Tor Browser на твой компьютер, существуют также операционные системы, специально разработанные для подключения к сети Tor, такие как [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) на [Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os), которые обеспечивают еще большую безопасность и защиту, чем стандартный Tor Browser сам по себе.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Tillägg

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave дозволяє вибрати додаткові фільтри вміс

 - Виберіть **Розширення (без резервного)** у розділі *Типовий гаманець Ethereum*
 - Виберіть **Розширення (без резервного)** у розділі *Типовий гаманець Solana*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Розширення

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ schema:

 </div>

-Браузер Tor розроблений таким чином, щоб запобігти зняттю відбитків або ідентифікації вас на основі конфігурації вашого браузера. Тому вкрай важливо, щоб ви **не** змінювали браузер за межами стандартних [рівнів безпеки](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). Змінюючи налаштування рівня безпеки, ви завжди **повинні** перезапустити браузер, перш ніж продовжувати користуватися ним. В іншому випадку [налаштування безпеки можуть бути застосовані не в повному обсязі](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), що призведе до більшого ризику зняття відбитків та їх використання зловмисниками, ніж ви можете очікувати, виходячи з обраних налаштувань.
+Браузер Tor розроблений таким чином, щоб запобігти зняттю відбитків або ідентифікації вас на основі конфігурації вашого браузера. Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. В іншому випадку [налаштування безпеки можуть бути застосовані не в повному обсязі](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw), що призведе до більшого ризику зняття відбитків та їх використання зловмисниками, ніж ви можете очікувати, виходячи з обраних налаштувань.

 Окрім встановлення Tor Browser безпосередньо на ваш комп'ютер, існують також операційні системи, розроблені спеціально для підключення до мережі Tor, такі як [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) на [Qubes OS](desktop.md#qubes-os), які забезпечують ще більшу безпеку і захист, ніж стандартний Tor Browser.

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### Extensions

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ The Tor network is not the perfect privacy protection tool in all cases and has

 ### Tor 瀏覽器不是最*安全*的瀏覽器

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). 依網路安全的經驗法則，單一文化通常認為不好：透過多樣性（Tor 所缺乏的）實現安全性，透過將漏洞限制在較小的群體中，提供了自然隔離通常是可取的，但這種多樣性對於匿名性來說也不太有利。
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 此外，Tor 瀏覽器是 Firefox 的擴展支援版本，僅接收被視為*嚴重*和*高*漏洞的補丁>（不是*中*和*低*）。 這意味著攻擊者可以（例如）：

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - 將 *預設以太坊錢包* 設定為 **擴充功能 (無後援)**
 - 將 *預設 Solana 錢包* 設定為 **擴充功能 (無後援)**
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### 擴充功能

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Some of these apps are better than others; making a determination comes down to

 </div>

-Tor 瀏覽器旨在防止指紋識別----根據您的瀏覽器配置識別您。 因此， **不應** 修改瀏覽器超出預設 [安全級別](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings)。 When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. 否則，[安全設定可能無法完全套用](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw)，使您遭受指紋辨識和漏洞利用的風險比您對所選設定的預期還要高。
+Tor 瀏覽器旨在防止指紋識別----根據您的瀏覽器配置識別您。 Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. 否則，[安全設定可能無法完全套用](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw)，使您遭受指紋辨識和漏洞利用的風險比您對所選設定的預期還要高。

 除了直接在電腦安裝 Tor 瀏覽器外，還有專門設計用於連接到 Tor 網路的操作系統，例如 [Qubes OS 作業系統](desktop.md#qubes-os) ＋ [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) ，它們提供比標準 Tor 瀏覽器更高的安全性和保護。

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Tor 網路並非在任何情況下都是完美的隱私保護工具，其存在

 ### Tor 瀏覽器不是最*安全*的瀏覽器

-匿名性常常與安全性互相矛盾：Tor 的匿名性要求每個使用者都是相同的，這會造成單一文化（所有 Tor 瀏覽器使用者都存在相同的錯誤）。 依網路安全的經驗法則，單一文化通常認為不好：透過多樣性（Tor 所缺乏的）實現安全性，透過將漏洞限制在較小的群體中，提供了自然隔離通常是可取的，但這種多樣性對於匿名性來說也不太有利。
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 此外，Tor 瀏覽器是 Firefox 的擴展支援版本，僅接收被視為*嚴重*和*高*漏洞的補丁>（不是*中*和*低*）。 這意味著攻擊者可以（例如）：

@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ Brave 的 Web3 功能可能會增加您的瀏覽器數位指紋與攻擊面。

 - 將 *預設以太坊錢包* 設定為 **擴充功能 (無後援)**
 - 將 *預設 Solana 錢包* 設定為 **擴充功能 (無後援)**
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*

 #### 擴充功能

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ schema:

 </div>

-Tor 瀏覽器旨在防止指紋識別----根據您的瀏覽器配置識別您。 因此， **不應** 修改瀏覽器超出預設 [安全級別](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings)。 修改安全層級後，您**必須**重新啟動瀏覽器才能繼續使用。 否則，[安全設定可能無法完全套用](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw)，使您遭受指紋辨識和漏洞利用的風險比您對所選設定的預期還要高。
+Tor 瀏覽器旨在防止指紋識別----根據您的瀏覽器配置識別您。 Therefore, it is imperative that you do **not** modify the browser beyond the default [security levels](https://tb-manual.torproject.org/security-settings). When modifying the security level setting, you **must** always restart the browser before continuing to use it. 否則，[安全設定可能無法完全套用](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/05/02/tor-security-slider-flaw)，使您遭受指紋辨識和漏洞利用的風險比您對所選設定的預期還要高。

 除了直接在電腦安裝 Tor 瀏覽器外，還有專門設計用於連接到 Tor 網路的操作系統，例如 [Qubes OS 作業系統](desktop.md#qubes-os) ＋ [Whonix](desktop.md#whonix) ，它們提供比標準 Tor 瀏覽器更高的安全性和保護。

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ It is critical to understand the difference between bypassing censorship and eva

 ### Tor Browser is not the most *secure* browser

-Anonymity can often be at odds with security: Tor's anonymity requires every user to be identical, which creates a monoculture (e.g., the same bugs are present across all Tor Browser users). As a cybersecurity rule of thumb, monocultures are generally regarded as bad: Security through diversity (which Tor lacks) provides natural segmentation by limiting vulnerabilities to smaller groups, and is therefore usually desirable, but this diversity is also less good for anonymity.
+Anonymity can often be at odds with security. Tor achieves anonymity by ensuring every user appears identical, creating a digital monoculture where the same vulnerabilities exist across all installations. In cybersecurity, monocultures are generally considered a risk. Security through diversity provides natural segmentation by limiting the impact of an exploit to a smaller segment of users. While such diversity is structurally desirable for security, it inherently compromises user anonymity by making individuals trackable.

 Additionally, Tor Browser is based on Firefox's Extended Support Release builds, which only receives patches for vulnerabilities considered *Critical* and *High* (not *Medium* and *Low*). This means that attackers could (for example):

@@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ Brave's Web3 features can potentially add to your browser fingerprint and attack

 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Ethereum wallet*
 - Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Solana wallet*
+- Select **Extensions (no fallback)** under *Default Cardano wallet*