mirror of
https://github.com/privacyguides/i18n.git
synced 2025-08-29 17:39:16 +00:00
New Crowdin translations by GitHub Action
This commit is contained in:
@@ -460,17 +460,17 @@ We regard these features as important in order to provide a safe and optimal ser
|
||||
|
||||
**最良の場合:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Support for hardware authentication, i.e. U2F and [WebAuthn](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebAuthn). U2F and WebAuthn are more secure as they use a private key stored on a client-side hardware device to authenticate people, as opposed to a shared secret that is stored on the web server and on the client side when using TOTP. Furthermore, U2F and WebAuthn are more resistant to phishing as their authentication response is based on the authenticated [domain name](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name).
|
||||
- ハードウェア認証のサポート、つまり U2Fと[WebAuthn](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebAuthn)。 U2F and WebAuthn are more secure as they use a private key stored on a client-side hardware device to authenticate people, as opposed to a shared secret that is stored on the web server and on the client side when using TOTP. Furthermore, U2F and WebAuthn are more resistant to phishing as their authentication response is based on the authenticated [domain name](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name).
|
||||
- [DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6844) in addition to DANE support.
|
||||
- Implementation of [Authenticated Received Chain (ARC)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authenticated_Received_Chain), this is useful for people who post to mailing lists [RFC8617](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8617).
|
||||
- バグ報奨金プログラムおよび/または協調的な脆弱性開示プロセス。
|
||||
- Website security standards such as:
|
||||
- [Content Security Policy (CSP)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_Security_Policy)
|
||||
- 以下のようなウェブサイトのセキュリティ基準:
|
||||
- [コンテンツセキュリティポリシー(CSP)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_Security_Policy)
|
||||
- [RFC9163 Expect-CT](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9163/)
|
||||
|
||||
### 信頼
|
||||
|
||||
You wouldn't trust your finances to someone with a fake identity, so why trust them with your email? 推奨されるプロバイダーには、自社の所有権やリーダーシップについて公表することが求められます。 また、特に政府からの要請がどのように処理されるかについて、透明性の高い報告が頻繁に行われることを望んでいます。
|
||||
あなたは偽の身分証を持つ人物に自分の財政を託すことはないでしょう、それではなぜ電子メールではそれらを信頼するのですか? 推奨されるプロバイダーには、自社の所有権やリーダーシップについて公表することが求められます。 また、特に政府からの要請がどのように処理されるかについて、透明性の高い報告が頻繁に行われることを望んでいます。
|
||||
|
||||
**最低条件:**
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user