mirror of
https://github.com/privacyguides/i18n.git
synced 2025-06-30 22:22:38 +00:00
New Crowdin translations by GitHub Action
This commit is contained in:
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Common Misconceptions"
|
||||
icon: 'material/robot-confused'
|
||||
description: Privacy isn't a straightforward topic, and it's easy to get caught up in marketing claims and other disinformation.
|
||||
description: Datenschutz ist kein einfaches Thema, und es ist leicht, sich von Marketingaussagen und anderen Desinformationen täuschen zu lassen.
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
-
|
||||
"@context": https://schema.org
|
||||
@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ schema:
|
||||
mainEntity:
|
||||
-
|
||||
"@type": Question
|
||||
name: Is open-source software inherently secure?
|
||||
name: Ist Open-Source-Software per se sicher?
|
||||
acceptedAnswer:
|
||||
"@type": Answer
|
||||
text: |
|
||||
Whether the source code is available and how software is licensed does not inherently affect its security in any way. Open-source software has the potential to be more secure than proprietary software, but there is absolutely no guarantee this is the case. When you evaluate software, you should look at the reputation and security of each tool on an individual basis.
|
||||
Ob der Quellcode verfügbar ist und wie die Software lizenziert wird, hat erstmal keinen Einfluss auf ihre Sicherheit. Open-Source-Software hat das Potenzial, sicherer zu sein als proprietäre Software, aber es gibt absolut keine Garantie dafür, dass dies der Fall ist. Bei der Bewertung von Software sollten Sie den Ruf und die Sicherheit jedes einzelnen Tools berücksichtigen.
|
||||
-
|
||||
"@type": Question
|
||||
name: Can shifting trust to another provider increase privacy?
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user