1
0
mirror of https://github.com/privacyguides/blog.privacyguides.org.git synced 2025-07-22 19:31:08 +00:00

Fix markdown errors

This commit is contained in:
2022-10-25 18:02:10 -05:00
parent 7b4ef5696c
commit 1bbd5a780f
9 changed files with 49 additions and 36 deletions

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Not so long ago, the world was predicting the end for Facebook. Now it is no mor
Facebook has not disappeared. No, not even the damning Facebook Papers can shut it down. Mark Zuckerberg stood up on stage, and announced that it had changed its name to: Meta.<!-- more -->
A key part of this new vision for the company is the idea of the metaverse. If it sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie or novel, thats because it is. The term was first coined by author Neal Stephenson in his 1992 book _Snow Crash_. Zuckerbergs only problem is that novel was dystopian. Heres a brief snippet of Stephensons description of the metaverse:
A key part of this new vision for the company is the idea of the metaverse. If it sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie or novel, thats because it is. The term was first coined by author Neal Stephenson in his 1992 book *Snow Crash*. Zuckerbergs only problem is that novel was dystopian. Heres a brief snippet of Stephensons description of the metaverse:
> “Your avatar can look any way you want it to, up to the limitations of your equipment. If youre ugly, you can make your avatar beautiful. If youve just gotten out of bed, your avatar can still be wearing beautiful clothes and professionally applied makeup. You can look like a gorilla or a dragon or a giant talking penis in the Metaverse. Spend five minutes walking down the Street and you will see all of these.”
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ In fairness, that doesnt seem unlike the sort of content you see on Facebook
The similarities are uncanny.
This wouldnt be the first time that Facebook has been described as dystopian. One _Mashable_ article [called](https://mashable.com/article/facebook-dystopia) the social media giant Orwellian and Huxleyan at the same time. Quite a feat.
This wouldnt be the first time that Facebook has been described as dystopian. One *Mashable* article [called](https://mashable.com/article/facebook-dystopia) the social media giant Orwellian and Huxleyan at the same time. Quite a feat.
The Facebook Papers have some pretty shocking-though not entirely surprising-revelations as well. The leaked documents demonstrate the extent to which Facebook values engagement above all else (including a good experience). For instance, we learnt that the algorithm is [optimised](https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-transparency-biggest-sites-pages-links/) for low quality content, [prioritises](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/10/26/facebook-angry-emoji-algorithm/) rage over happiness for profit, and [promotes](https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/10/facebook-papers-democracy-election-zuckerberg/620478/) extremist content. Most alarming was that the firm [failed](https://apnews.com/article/the-facebook-papers-covid-vaccine-misinformation-c8bbc569be7cc2ca583dadb4236a0613) to reduce disinformation during the pandemic even when given the opportunity. Zuckerberg said no to this, presumably because it would reduce engagement and, in turn, Facebooks advertising revenue.
@@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ Lets not forget all Facebooks previous scandals. From the Cambridge Analyt
In light of this, the name change makes sense. It deceives you into thinking the company has evolved into a benevolent corporation, when it simply hasnt. Zuckerberg would much prefer you to think about Meta as a playful universe where you can meet with friends across the globe in virtual reality. Where humans train themselves to sound like heavily discounted robots. Where Facebook is not a Horrid Company.
Despite all this: Meta _is_ Facebook, just worse. It doesnt matter about the new name, the company has not changed. It will still be violating our privacy, daily, on an unprecedented scale. It will still be as reliably scandalous as a Carry On film. It will still be terrible. Plus it will have all the added claptrap of a sub-par holographic universe attached.
Despite all this: Meta *is* Facebook, just worse. It doesnt matter about the new name, the company has not changed. It will still be violating our privacy, daily, on an unprecedented scale. It will still be as reliably scandalous as a Carry On film. It will still be terrible. Plus it will have all the added claptrap of a sub-par holographic universe attached.